I have always taken my privilege as an American to vote very seriously. I made sure to be informed about the major issues, propositions, and candidates and not to vote for someone I didn’t know anything about.
That said, I often picked my candidate based more on who the pundits said was electable, and/or who was my party’s candidate than I did based on my own serious study of the candidates themselves, their character and their personal convictions.
This election is very different for me. I am so very disappointed in President Bush. I had high hopes and expectations for him, based on the campaign he ran in 2000. He claimed he would do so many things, and accomplish so much, yet most of it has never come to pass. And many things he’s pushed hard for in recent years are things with which I strongly disagree. And he’s blown it over and over — New Orleans/FEMA is a great example — and never once owned up to the fact that he screwed up. No humility. And that’s very disappointing.
For the first time ever I’m closely watching every debate and looking very closely at every candidate — even the democrats — to see not only who’s convictions most closely mirror my own on issues I’ve decided are key for me at this time, but also who’s character really does seem to be genuine and solid.
For a while now I’ve hadn’t seen someone I felt I could really trust. I liked some of what some Republican candidates say, but not all of it. While some have me on a couple of issues, they lost me on many others. I want to like Ron Paul, but too often he shoots himself in the foot spouting off some radical ideas with which I don’t agree. There’s something about Mitt Romney I just don’t like; he smiles too much. I don’t trust someone who smiles all the time (which is one of the reasons I don’t trust Joel Osteen, btw). And his smile is—smarmy — at least to me. I like Fred, but sometimes he scares me. Giuliani is okay, but not my favorite; McCain is a little too hawkish for me and Tancredo doesn’t even show up on my radar. Only two candidates have consistently risen to the top of my list; Fred Thompson and Mike Huckabee.
But I think I’ve found my candidate. Friday evening I watched Mike Huckabee on Glen Beck — you can read the transcript of their conversation here and I gotta tell ya, I was very impressed with him. Very impressed. I’ve been watching him closely anyway; he’s impressed me in the debates — especially when he held his own against Ron Paul. But Friday evening he won me over. He clearly, concisely, and passionately but intelligently laid out his convictions and his platform and I heard much of my own heart echoed there. His stand on energy, the economy, taxes, securing our borders and national security, and even health care not only made incredible sense but closely mirrored my own opinions and convictions. We’re certainly not "of one mind" on everything, but then again, can you ever find that?
Also, Huckabee’s demeanor and body language was appropriate to the topics of conversation; he didn’t smile too much or smirk at all. I sensed no pride or arrogance or any sense of entitlement. What I saw was a humble, passionate, rather witty man absolutely convinced of his convictions and convinced he had some answers (not all; again, humility) to America’s problems and a way make America an even better nation.
For the first time in my life I am actually making a decision on a candidate not based on electability first but based first and foremost on my own convictions of what needs to be done and what is best for America. And it feels good. š And I’m actually willing to, and considering, volunteering for the campaign — again, for the first time — to help get the word out about Huckabee so he will be electable. He impressed me that much. I encourage you to read the transcript of the Glen Beck show, check out his website and his stand on the issues, and decide for yourself whether this is a man of character who would a) return America to the constitution it was based upon, and b) lead America into a better future. As for me, I think I’m sold.
Hi Lu! I’ve been trying to ignore this election until after the calendar year changes, myself, but am starting to feel guilty. I don’t watch TV and have gotten out of reading the paper so I’m not getting as much info as you do. Anyway, time to start paying attention. I’ll take a look at your candidate, dem. though I am! (for the top offices I end up voting almost half-and-half).
I think I might spend half a day at my nearest big bookstore, skimming through some of the books written by or about some of the candidates – not something we’ve always had.
The thing about humility… I’m not convinced GWB has none. It’s this principle he has that to admit the possibility of being wrong; that it would be bad for the country if he showed weakness. I don’t buy the theory but I don’t think I entirely understand it either. In my own circles I’ve often been around leaders who consider confidence a better gift to their supporters than accuracy, and I’m struggling with that. I see it working. And I don’t like that it works.
You know when you’re in a situation where a leader says, “Yeah, this is bad, but it’s not as bad as it looks because at least we have [this], and you relax, and then [this] turns out not to be part of the deal after all, but you’ve already relaxed and committed to go along with things? It’s been happening to me a lot. Not sure what to do about that! I think it’s happening at the macro level with the war, etc. as well.
Still looking for patterns… and trying to learn from them.
As a
Marti
That’s a really good point about the humility thing. I hadn’t really thought of that. Yeah, I’ve had leaders like that too and it is very frustrating. But they don’t understand why, because they think they are being positive and honest (or is that honestly positive…?). I’ve gotten to the point where I don’t trust people who do that because I feel they are relying on faulty information/premise.
But it also comes down to whether or not that’s a hill I’m prepared to die on. For me I’m usually not, so I let the leader go on in their little bubble and I just do my thing as best I can. In the case of GWB, though, it’s getting harder and harder I think for the people under him to keep doing their thing. The only consolation is he only has a year left.
Regarding the candidates, I’ve thought of reading a few of the books too. But I’m kind of where you are in regards to time for reading. I’m reading three heavy-duty spiritual (work) books and getting ready to start some math classes that will require another two to three books, and I’m re-reading the Harry Potter books for a little entertainment in the middle of the hard books. I think if I added even one more book to my “currently reading” list, the whole stack is gonna topple over and bury me! š It’s a lot easier to watch (or sometimes listen as I multi-task with other things) television interviews and debates. It takes much less time than reading a big book…
So, that’s why you like Grey’s Anatomy, the TV show, and not Grey’s Anatomy, the big book! Well, I’m sure each is fascinating in its own way.
Don’t let life swamp you. Keep breathing. You’re going to make it!