A Time To…

Nearly 4 years ago I lost both my parents within 6 days of each other. A few days later my overseas missionary team, which was highly dysfunctional to begin with, began a painful implosion, and I made a choice a few months later to stay home and get healthy rather than go back overseas and serve in my emotionally crippled state. In just a few short months I had lost my parents, my sense of "family", my job, my home, my career and my dreams. I was devastated. And my life was decimated.  I was told by three different counselors that I had enough losses tallied up to "send me to Mars and back," or at least to a loony-bin for a bit. One of them at least still seems to marvel that I was still walking and talking and functioning in the world at that point.

I think have a pretty good idea what grief is.

Over at Kat Coble’s blog-house there’s a discussion on public grief going on. Kat (both of the Kats in my life, actually) is always good at making me think. I guess this is why she won the Thinking Blogger Award. Doh. At any rate, Kat honestly asked, Does grief now need to be public in order to be real?

What a powerful, meaty question.

I have watched the public response to the Virginia Tech tragedy with a mix of curiosity and sadness. As someone who’s lost loved ones (I kinda dislike the triteness of that phrase, but it serves me well here), I know all to well the agony the next year holds for the families and friends of the dead. But truthfully I feel more pain and sorrow for my boss, who just unexpectedly lost his mom, than I do for the strangers in Virginia. Its not that I don’t feel for them or have compassion for their loss. Its just that I’m not connected to them. And therein lies my curiosity with the public grief currently sweeping the nation over this tragedy. What is it that causes us human beings to be swept up in other’s emotions?  And must grief now be public to truly be grief? If we don’t grieve publicly, does it mean we are unfeeling, disconnected and cold?

I struggled with the question of public grief a lot at the time of my parents’ deaths because in the beginning I felt only moments of agony (grief) followed by long stretches of blissful quiet nothingness. Because I didn’t cry at their memorial services I thought there must something really, really wrong with me — aren’t you supposed to cry at your parents funerals?? I began to be convinced I must be shamefully disconnected from my own self and emotions. Turns out I was, but without the shame. It’s called the “shock” stage of grief and it is a blessed, blessed thing to which I sometimes wish I could briefly revisit.

Anyway… I’ve since realized that I can no more predict how I will react in the face of painful, terrible loss than I can predict the weather in Tennessee. Nothing is normal so everything is normal.

The movie “The Queen” addresses this issue of public versus private grief in such a powerful way. It really made me re-think how I looked at the Royal Family during the public mourning of Diana’s death. And it reminded me of how most of my own grief has been quite blessedly private.

In just the last decade our country has had many reasons to mourn. Columbine, September 11th, the Iraq War, and now the Virginia Tech shootings, just to name a few. We’ve had a good deal of tragedy. Yet realistically, our parents and grandparents had much, much more. Vietnam, JFK’s assassination, Martin Luther King’s assassination, Korea, World War II, the Depression, World War I… And that’s just the national ones. There are countless other more personal, private tragedies for each one of them, made all the worse from ours by the lack of medical technologies and psychological understandings. Us Gen-Xers and Y-ers and the Boomers just haven’t had life all that tough in comparison.

Yet we seem to be the most melodramatic when it comes to public grief. Don’t we? I’m not saying our parents and grandparents didn’t publicly grieve. I’m saying we have a tendency to be so much more morbidly fascinated with and compelled to grieve publicly for people we do not know than they were. And I rather feel that most of what I see today in the way of public grieving is more of either an emotional mob mentality grief, or a misplaced focus of grief.

What I mean by the first is like what you see in preschool when one kid is really crying out of hurt or fear and the rest of the group follows suit.  It’s not that the other kids are faking it (if you’ve had to deal with this lovely phenomena, you know they’re not!), its just that the first child’s pain is so real and powerful that the rest become frightened to tears by the possibility that something that bad is coming for them too and the only way they know how to respond is to cry hysterically.

You see this with high school girls too. I remember some kid at my high school, not horrendously popular but known, died in a car crash (involving drunk driving) and the next day nearly every single girl on campus (and a surprisingly large amount of guys) all crying hysterically very publicly for the next couple of weeks. The school even called in a grief counselor to help get things back under control. Now, this was a school of several thousand students. My graduating class alone was around 1400, so even if this guy was Mr.-King-of-popularity – which he most definitely was NOT – that many girls could not have known him personally enough to be driven mad with grief by his death.

Sometimes the power of someone’s grief touches some wound, some fear or some pain at the core of who we are. We cannot identify that thing that was touched, we only know the touching caused searing pain or overwhelming fear and we respond with powerful emotions of our own, that others and often we ourselves mistake for grief.

What I mean by the second is that all too often we in America (or perhaps its all of western society) are, I think, convinced grief is about the people we lose whether we know them or not when nothing could be further from the truth. Grief is not about them, it is about us. It’s about what WE have lost. We grieve for ourselves and how our lives will never be the same because of what we have lost.

Nor is grief limited to people. It’s also about dreams, jobs, careers, homes, cities and towns, places, things, ideals… anything we have lost that deeply meant something to us. So many things in our lives die and deserve to be properly grieved! Yet I think people in America these days feel we cannot grieve over anything but people.

So our national grief over September 11th, became more about the people who died rather than what we truly lost as individuals and collectively as a nation. What tragedy! What a way to compound tragedy. What we who didn’t know anyone in the Towers lost as individuals was our sense of security, our sense of safety in our own homes, workplaces and towns, our sense of immortality, our innocence of the realities of war…. But because it’s socially unacceptable to grieve these seemingly selfish and trivial things when thousands have lost parents, siblings, spouses, children, lovers and dear friends, we take our grief and (mis)place it onto people we don’t know and claim we mourn their loss.

Aw, come on people! We need to grieve what WE lost. I wept bitterly over September 11th because I lost a great deal. No, I didn’t lose someone I loved, but dang, I lost the nation I thought I lived in! I lost the state of security and safety I thought existed around me. I lost my ability to trust foreigners – and I HATE that! You lost a great deal too. And even though the Virginia Tech shootings don’t have the national impact that September 11th did, there are still countless parents who suddenly lost any sense of safety for their children in college and students lost a sense of safety and stability in their college lives. Those are things worth grieving. And when we deny ourselves that time, and worse yet, deny we are truly grieving for those things by claiming our grief is for the dead, we rob ourselves of the chance to heal from that tragedy.

That is not to say that we don’t grieve with the families who lost people they loved in the Towers, or at the University this week. We feel for them; we feel sadness and empathy for the loss of the ones they love in their lives. BUT What we grieve personally is whatever we personally, intimately lost in that tragedy, and for most of us it isn’t people.

I think another thing we grieve but (mis)place onto anonymous people, is our loss/lack of deep connection with others. Stay with me here a moment…. What I saw in those girls back in high school was a desperate need to feel connected to something or someone in a deep way, perhaps even just to feel something real period. I don’t think we have that really anymore in our society. Oh, everybody wears their "feelings on their sleeves", yet very few really have truly deep relationships, ones where feelings can be expressed without fear.

There is something about detailed knowledge of someone that causes us to feel connected to them, and can deceive us into believing we are more connected to people than we really are. We are so informed about the lives of people we don’t even know that we have pictures and minute details of the last time they shaved their head and went a little nuts, and it makes us feel like we know them. But we don’t. So of course when we know just as much detail about the people around us, we think we must have a deep connection with them – because after all, if we have a connection to Britney and we don’t even know her, we must have a DEEP connection with those we know (for some odd reason in our society knowledge = relationship. How messed up is that?).  Too often the connections in our lives don’t satisfy us; more often than not they are superficial at best, and not deep as we suppose them to be.

The made-public death of a fellow-anything (student, co-worker, artist, etc), reminds our souls of that deep longing for real connection, real satisfying relationships, and grief over our own dissatisfaction bubbles to the surface. The current love-affair with public grieving gives us a free pass to cry and scream and get hysterical (to feel, in other words) as well as a safe way to grieve our own loss/lack of deep relationships without appearing self-centered in a moment of such tragedy for others.

Grief is so unpredictable. It sneaks up on you and bites you in the butt when you least expect it. It shows itself in public sometimes in ways that does not look at all like grief and other times reveals its true fire in private moments of agony. Sometimes it looks like sorrow, sometimes it looks like depression, sometimes it looking like a angry raging lunatic hell-bent on revenge, or at least a piece of somebody’s ass to chew off. And then, sometimes things that look like grief are not really grief at all. Fear especially loves to masquerade as grief, because it gets a lot more attention and acceptance that way.

I can’t say why all the people are crying over the shootings at Virginia Tech right now. But I have to wonder what it was in this incident that tapped into hidden losses and fears. For me it’s another reminder of all the losses in my life and my deep-rooted fear of losing someone or something else. Thankfully, my own pain and fears haven’t given me much grief over this whole tragedy (they’ve been deeply fixed on another, but that’s another post). But the huge public reaction – including my company opening up a meeting room for people to view the televised Memorial Service – does really intrigue me as I watch others struggle through the powerful emotions this incident brought forth.

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 thoughts on “A Time To…

  1. Lu –
    As usual, your insight leaves me staggered. You are precious & I thank God for the opportunity to lurk on your blog and read about your life – it helps me to know how to pray for you.
    ‘Lish

  2. ‘Lish! Thank you! And thank you for continuing to read, especially such loooong missives like this one. 🙂 I miss you, friend. I pray for ya’ll continually.
    Larry – Okay. Apparently what I need to do is vomit up all my words into an email to you and let you summarize it all for me, so I don’t end up with such loooong posts. 🙂 You said in one sentence EXACTLY what I spent 2,121 words trying to say. Geez.

  3. This is a topic I’ve been thinking on much lately. I’ve spent most of my life denying my nature. As God works to bring me back to who I am (who He says I am) emotions loom more important as the capability to feel is an essential part of life. I’d prefer to just go on denying the whole dense thicket.
    Our culture is no better. Emotions are OK if they fit within certain Hallmark-defined pigeonholes. The expression of true emotion tends to really upset people, and me especially.
    We’re not taught anything about how to handle them in a real way. Followers of Jesus should be leading the way on this: we have the Holy Spirit to help us keep from being deflected or drowned in feeling. Yet our faith has become a largely intellectual process.
    Intellect is important. So are emotions. How else can we appreciate God’s kindness? I was out mountain biking this morning, just sort of touring around. Clouds were overhead, and light rain had fallen sometime earlier. I started up one trail and my feelings, tuned to more sensitivity by the environment, caught a message: turn around and head for home. “Well, OK Lord.” I headed down the hill and got to the beach. The western horizon was gone, hidden by a veil of rain. I got home about five minutes before it cut loose. Now, why would God care about one of his kids geting wet? I have no idea, other than kindness. If God feels that kind of thing for me why can’t I feel something for him? Somewhere between intellect and the outpouring of fake TV emotion is the real thing. That’s what I want.
    There. I can be long-winded too. Think of it this way: your post goes into more detail and background.

  4. I miss you too! I missed something somewhere along the way…what are you doing work-wise and school(?)-wise…are you still involved with the church plant? I could probably get these answers and more just by reading back blogs….and will if you’d prefer.
    ‘Lish

  5. Lu, you bring up a good point to the question: Does grief have to be public to be real? What about twisting that around a bit by asking: Is public grief real? I’m not talking about the truly huge events: the attacks on 9/11, President Reagan’s shooting in the 80’s, JFK’s death, etc. Those are obviously real because they do touch on all of us (or at least most of us) on some level or another.
    I didn’t lose anyone personally in the 9/11 attacks, but I too felt attacked because I could no longer trust that planes were going to stay in the sky, that neighbors aren’t a benign as they appear from across the street, and that our basic tenets of life (life, liberty and the pursuit of happyness) aren’t as altruistic as I previously believed. I still remember the shock and horror I felt, not just watching it happen on TV or talking to friends and family afterward as we tried to figure what it all meant, but also that I hadn’t met most of my neighbors until we all stood on the curbs with candles one week after the attacks sharing our grief with each other and anyone driving down the street.
    I’m sure similar reactions were had during other major national tragedies. Those are all understandable and, personally I think, justified reasons for public grief, but joining with your neighbors and strangers to grieve over losses that will never be regained.
    However, I don’t understand the overwhelming reactions we’re seeing over other tragic events such as the Virginia Tech shootings. I’m not suggesting we shouldn’t feel for the people directly and indirectly involved. But is it justified to have a national moment of silence for the dead when the vast majority of us have never been to VT, met a single student or even were aware of the college until this happened? I feel badly for the families and friends of the dead. I feel awful that the school has to deal with the emotional, mental and financial aftermath of this gunman’s handiwork. But is flying flags at half-mast (which was happening all over Vegas and LA this week), something that should be done for a localized event?
    And therein lies, I think, some of the answers for why national and public grief is being so rampant. Nothing is truly localized anymore. Instant messaging, cell phones, Blackberries, emails, CNN and the like are tying us all together into one large, dysfuncational family that can’t quite decide if we like each other or would prefer to ignore each other. So when tragedy does strike – school shootings, tsunamis, hurricanes, snipers, etc – we all feel a need to band together and assure ourselves that we’re not alone. I don’t believe most of the public grief is for the losses themselves. I know that sounds callous, but stick with me for a moment. I think much of the public grief is for the fear we have that we might be next, that we’re somewhere in line waiting for an awful event to hit our lives and our loved ones. So to ensure that we will have the support we’ll need to survive, we offer it up to everyone around us, regardless of whether we know them or not.

  6. Lu, appreciate your post. As a kind-of international person I had a mixed response to the Virginia Tech thing; at a church retreat this weekend they had us read out the names of the kids who died. Thirty-some senseless deaths… but are they more tragic than others? I felt the same twinge I’d felt at the office, trying to decide if we needed to pray about the Virginia situation, instead, when I had prepared stuff for us to pray about regarding the significant religious persecution going on in Ethiopia and Nigeria; more believers have been martyred in both places recently.
    A church has daily updates on the kid with cancer while nobody notices the old woman wasting away in depression. Or worse, bitterness. Not so cuddly.
    So: what gets attention, what does not, is not fair, is not even.
    But in whatever way, on whatever ocassion, the experience of grief is something we share. If not grief for Christians overseas, grief for Americans we’ve never met; if not grief for Iraqi women whose families’ futures are so precarious in a civil war, then grief for an American who just sent her son to their country. And grief for our own losses, and broken dreams.
    The world is no worse than it ever was; nor is it any better. Yet globalization, technology, and other cultural shifts change the way we grieve today.
    When I think of grief I think of 2 Cor. 7:10, which is about grief over sin. It says there are two kinds of sorrow. “Godly sorrow brings repentance that leads to salvation and leaves no regret, but worldly sorrow brings death.”
    I think this has to do with how we respond to the life-giver in our times of grief. Do we call out to God – even in anger – and ‘remain in him,’ a connection which seems to bring joy in heaven – or do we turn from him, become hard and bitter and try to avoid trusting in or depending on him?
    Going through significant personal grief in the dissolving of our ministry recently, and a couple of other things… My emotions are messy. Which makes my relationships messy. And because of the way my life is set up, this whole thing with being a missionary, doing newsletters or whatever, my own awkward grief becomes a public thing. I have mixed feelings about that, too.